Customer vs Consumer
The difference between a consumer and a customer, is a very thin line. Aside from both terms being used frequently in the field of business, these words are often used in a similar context, which adds up to the confusion.
By definition, a customer is someone who buys services or goods from someone else while a consumer is someone that consumes a certain product or commodity. In the concept of Economics, a consumer can either be a single person or an entire organization, that uses a certain type of service. Consumers can also be any form of organism, that devours or eats something, as in the field of Science and Ecology.
For example, a customer is best exemplified by a coffee shop, that buys a coffee maker, from a coffee maker manufacturer. This means that the restaurant buys the said equipment, for the benefit of its patrons or guests. In this connection, the restaurant is clearly pictured as a customer and not the actual consumer. However, in a similar scenario wherein you directly go to the coffee maker manufacturer and buy their product so that you can bring it home for your family’s use at home, then you are the real consumer.
Simply said, if you are going to use a particular product for purposes other than your own consumption, like for commercial usage, then you are considered a customer.
However, according to the Consumer Protection Act of India in 1986, the term, ‘consumer’ has a broader, meaning to include those who use a product or commodity for a living. And so, if you are the sole proprietor of your company and you purchased the coffee maker under your name, then you can still be considered a consumer according to this Act.
Furthermore, the Act expands the consumer definition even more by stating that a consumer does not need to buy products for personal usage to be considered as one, rather the mere thought or intent of buying already turns you into a consumer.
These definitions were actually drafted with the aim of consumer protection, especially when businesses turn a little bit sour.
The difference between a consumer and a customer, is a very thin line. Aside from both terms being used frequently in the field of business, these words are often used in a similar context, which adds up to the confusion.
By definition, a customer is someone who buys services or goods from someone else while a consumer is someone that consumes a certain product or commodity. In the concept of Economics, a consumer can either be a single person or an entire organization, that uses a certain type of service. Consumers can also be any form of organism, that devours or eats something, as in the field of Science and Ecology.
For example, a customer is best exemplified by a coffee shop, that buys a coffee maker, from a coffee maker manufacturer. This means that the restaurant buys the said equipment, for the benefit of its patrons or guests. In this connection, the restaurant is clearly pictured as a customer and not the actual consumer. However, in a similar scenario wherein you directly go to the coffee maker manufacturer and buy their product so that you can bring it home for your family’s use at home, then you are the real consumer.
Simply said, if you are going to use a particular product for purposes other than your own consumption, like for commercial usage, then you are considered a customer.
However, according to the Consumer Protection Act of India in 1986, the term, ‘consumer’ has a broader, meaning to include those who use a product or commodity for a living. And so, if you are the sole proprietor of your company and you purchased the coffee maker under your name, then you can still be considered a consumer according to this Act.
Furthermore, the Act expands the consumer definition even more by stating that a consumer does not need to buy products for personal usage to be considered as one, rather the mere thought or intent of buying already turns you into a consumer.
These definitions were actually drafted with the aim of consumer protection, especially when businesses turn a little bit sour.
- A consumer is someone who actually consumes the goods and not just purchases it.
- A costumer is someone who buys the goods for more commercial purposes.
- According to the 1986 Consumer Protections Act of India, a consumer can also be somebody who uses goods and services for a living. In addition, the mere intent of buying goods makes you a consumer, nonetheless.
Difference Between Wholesale and Retail
Wholesale vs Retail
The terms “wholesale” and “retail” themselves explain the difference. “Wholesale” means “selling in large quantities” and “retail” means “selling in small quantities.”
In wholesale, the goods are mainly sold to the retailer who sells it to the customers. A wholesaler might also sell the products directly to the customers.
One of the main differences between wholesale and retail is in the price of the goods. The wholesale price is always lower than the retail price. This is mainly because the retailer has to include many other costs while selling the goods. The retailer has to add costs like the salaries of employees, rents of shops, sales tax, and advertising of the goods that he buys from a wholesaler. A wholesaler does not worry much about all of these aspects which prompts him to sell goods at a lower price.
The wholesaler has direct links with the manufacturer and buys products or goods directly from him. On the other hand, a retailer has no direct contact with the manufacturer.
In choosing the quality, the retailer has an upper hand. A retailer can choose the products with quality and discard the damaged ones as they only buy small amounts. On the contrary, the wholesaler will not have a say in the quality as he has to buy in bulk from the manufacturer. This means that the retailer has the freedom to choose the products whereas the wholesaler does not have the freedom to choose the products.
It can also be seen that retailers have to spend more in maintaining the retail space as they have to attract the consumers. On the other hand, a wholesaler need not worry about the space as it is only the retailer who buys from him.
When comparing the profit margin, a wholesaler gets more profit than a retailer. But even then, a wholesaler gets more money as he sells in bulk. A retailer just sells only one product at a time.
Summary:
1.In wholesale, the goods are mainly sold to the retailer who sells it to the customers.
2.The wholesale price is always lower than the retail price.
3.The wholesaler has direct links with the manufacturer and buys products or goods directly from him. On the other hand, a retailer has no direct contact with the manufacturer.
4.A retailer can choose the products with quality and discard the damaged ones as they only buy small amounts. On the contrary, the wholesaler will not have a say in the quality as he has to buy in bulk from the manufacturer.
2.The wholesale price is always lower than the retail price.
3.The wholesaler has direct links with the manufacturer and buys products or goods directly from him. On the other hand, a retailer has no direct contact with the manufacturer.
4.A retailer can choose the products with quality and discard the damaged ones as they only buy small amounts. On the contrary, the wholesaler will not have a say in the quality as he has to buy in bulk from the manufacturer.
Difference Between a Broker and a Lender
Broker vs Lender
The difference between a broker and a lender is that the lender provides money to the debtor, whereas a broker is an agent who offers the loan products provided by various investors.
There are two types of lenders, retail lenders and wholesale lenders. Those who commence with the loan process themselves are called retailer, and those who hire contractors or brokers are called wholesale lenders. A broker acts like a commercial agent who is hired by the lender, or works as a freelancer. His target is to find potential customers. His job description includes counseling, credit problems and processing the loan etc.
Large lenders have a network of both retail and wholesale lending, and they hire a number of brokers who offer the loan products to customers. A broker compiles the file of information in which there are details about credit reports and different verifications, such as employment, assets, appraisal and transactions. The file is handed over to the lender who funds money once it is complete.
Large banks and lenders are called portfolio lenders, and they are also referred to as depository institutions. Credit unions, commercial banks and savings, and union and loan associations are all portfolio lenders.
The lender funds directly, while the broker sells loans and represents different lenders. Despite the differences between the lender and broker, both of them are looking forward to making a profit, and they have hidden markup fees as well.
The lender funds directly, while the broker sells loans and represents different lenders. Despite the differences between the lender and broker, both of them are looking forward to making a profit, and they have hidden markup fees as well.
Brokers and lenders need to obtain a license before offering their services. It is necessary to avoid illegitimate brokers or lenders, as doing business with them is not recommended. Their credibility can be verified with the help of various organizations.
Lenders lend the money to a borrower to pay the loan off. The loan also includes the added cost of interest. Different lenders have rate differences, and also their mark ups or interest rates are not the same.
Brokers act as intermediaries or agents between a client and the lender, and a commission is usually earned upon completion. They handle the process of loan in a correct and legitimate manner.
Brokers act as intermediaries or agents between a client and the lender, and a commission is usually earned upon completion. They handle the process of loan in a correct and legitimate manner.
Summary:
1. Lenders provide loans, whereas the broker provides the services for obtaining loans.
2. Brokers act like a commercial agent who works on a commission basis.
3. Large lenders, like banks or unions, are also called portfolio lenders.
4. Lenders and brokers both need to obtain a license before commencing their business.
5. Brokers and lenders both have hidden markups or interest fees that they charge to the customer for the loan .
1. Lenders provide loans, whereas the broker provides the services for obtaining loans.
2. Brokers act like a commercial agent who works on a commission basis.
3. Large lenders, like banks or unions, are also called portfolio lenders.
4. Lenders and brokers both need to obtain a license before commencing their business.
5. Brokers and lenders both have hidden markups or interest fees that they charge to the customer for the loan .
Simple Interest vs Compound Interest
Interest rate is generally defined as the cost for borrowing money. It is stated in percentage and set against the original amount of the borrowed money or the principal. There are two types of interests. One is simple interest while the other is compound interest. If you are planning to borrow money or to invest in the money market, you should get a clear idea about the difference between simple and compound interest.
First of all, simple interest is computed based on the principal only or original amount of the borrowed money. Compound interest on the other hand is computed periodically. The computations include the earned interest from the principal plus the compounded interest earned over a period of time.
Simple interest is applied on loans for single periods such as 30 days or 60 days. So if you get a short term loan for 60 days, the interest will be computed based on the original principal only. For long term loans, lenders usually apply compound interest. The periods are pre-defined by the lender. These could be quarterly, semi-annually, or annually. With compound interest, the interest earned during the previous period will be added to the principal. This will become the new principal and it will earn an interest according to the terms agreed.
You have to note that the growth of interest with simple interest calculation is constant. That is why it is the preferred system for short-term loans. With compound interest, the growth is exponential because the principal is getting bigger each period. Compounding interest is the fastest way to accumulate wealth so this is the preferred system of lenders and investors.
Simple interest and compound interest are radically different from each other. The former is usually applied to short-term loans while the latter is used for long term loans and investments.
Difference Between Megaupload and Rapidshare
Megaupload vs Rapidshare
Megaupload, established on 2005, is a Hong Kong-based online company for uploading and downloading computer files over the internet. The company’s key person is Kim Schmitz, a popular German hacker, who has been convicted of computer fraud, embezzlement, and insider trading.
Basically, Megaupload is an internet company that provides file hosting services. It offers free services, which allow users to upload files of up to 2048 Mb of storage space. This free service does not allow users to download files over the file size of 1 Gb. 200 Gbs of file storage is given to free registered users.
Registered users for the free Megaupload service are provided with 200 Gbs of file storage, which is quite adequate for most people. For premium users (registered and paying clients), the file storage space offered by Megaupload is unlimited. For every successful upload of files, the user is given a URL to allow other people to download the file over the internet.
Files that are uploaded anonymously will expire after 21 days, when no downloads occur within that timeframe. However, for free accounts, it will take up to 90 days before uploaded files expire, and premium accounts users will certainly have the best deal, as there will be no expiration as long as the individual maintains the premium membership.
Over a year after Megaupload’s establishment, Rapidshare started to operate its own file hosting services. Rapidshare is the direct and fiercest competitor of Megaupload. It also has free and premium services available. Their free services naturally have limitations and restrictions. Rapidshare is operated from Switzerland, but the company is German-owned. It is led by Bobby Chang, as the company’s CEO and COO.
At the time of this writing, Rapidshare is still operating two websites ‘“ the “rapidshare.de” and “rapidshare.com”. The former, using the German top-level domain, is the original website and the latter is the new and improved website. The original website will permanently cease to operate on March 1, 2010. The files there won’t be available for download anymore by that time and all users that go to that site will be redirected to “rapidshare.com”.
The style of Megaupload and Rapidshare’s services is fairly similar, with few distinctive differences. Rapidshare has a download limit of 25 Gb at certain times, even for premium users. Rapidshare stated that the reason for this is to save traffic. Megaupload, on the other hand, does not implement such restrictions.
However, Rapidshare has more users, and therefore, more files available. It is even (Alexa) ranked way above Megaupload, where it’s ranked 30 against Megaupload’s 83. The debate of which is faster can go back and forth, as it can also be subjective.
Both companies provide download managers, and give very similar privileges to their paying clients.
Summary:
1. Megaupload was first on the scene, established in 2005, over a year earlier than Rapidshare.
2. Interestingly enough, the German-owned Rapidshare is led by Bobby Chang, while the Hong Kong-based Megaupload is led by the popular, and formerly convicted German hacker, Kim Schmitz.
3. Rapidshare has a 25 Gb download limit at certain times for traffic saving purposes, while Megaupload does not subject its users to this type of limitation.
4. Rapidshare has more users and files available than Megaupload. Rapidshare’s (Alexa) rankings are higher as well.
5. Both Megaupload and Rapidshare’s basic services are fairly similar.
6. Currently, Rapidshare has two websites in operation.
Difference Between LCD and LED Televisions
LCD vs LED Televisions
The LCD television is a flat-panel television which utilizes a Liquid Crystal Display technology. It has two layers of glass which are polarized and stuck together. The liquid crystals are held in one of the layers. These liquid crystals pass, or block the light, to produce images on the screen when the electric current passes through it.
However, the crystals do not produce their own light. The light comes from the series of fluorescent lamps at the back of the screen. There are millions of shutters arranged in a grid, which open and close to release and trap some of the light that is not needed to create images. Then each shutter is paired with a colored filter which produces a sub-pixel. These are so small, that when they combine, they create a single pixel, which appears to be a single spot of color on the screen. With the help of the fluorescent lamps, the images created by the liquid crystals become visible to the viewer.
LCD television produces high image quality. They can be made very thin, which makes them less space-consuming, and the user can hang them anywhere. This makes them appealing to buyers.
LED TV’s are actually very much like LCD TV’s. They also have a flat-screen which utilizes Liquid Crystal Display technology. The only difference is their source of light, which is at the back of the screen. The LCD TV uses fluorescent lamps, and the LED TV uses LED (Light Emitting Diodes).
There are two types of LED backlighting. One is referred to as Edge lighting, and the other is called Full-Array lighting. With the Edge lighting, the series of diodes are arranged along the outside edges of the screen. When there is power, the light is distributed across the screen. Alternatively, in Full-Array lighting, there are several rows of diodes behind the entire surface of the screen. They provide more control over brightness and dimming, because the diodes can be turned on and off independently.
LED TV’s are LCD TV’s with a new backlight system. They are newly developed for LCD’s, because Light Emitting Diodes are said to give more balance in color saturation, and use less power than the fluorescent lamps. LED TV’s are the newest version, and that’s why they are currently more expensive than the standard LCD TV’s.
Summary:
LED TV’s are still LCD TV’s. They are just considered to be the newer LCD TV version because of the new backlight system used. The LED TV uses Light Emitting Diodes, while the standard LCD TV uses fluorescent lamps. Although they both still use Liquid Crystal Display technology. The main difference is the part behind their screen, which is the backlight
Difference Between Taliban and Al qaeda
Taliban vs Al Qaeda
1. Mullah Mohammed Omar founded Taliban and the credit for al qaeda goes to Osama bin laden.
2. Al Qaeda consists of Sunni Muslims who practise Wahabism, which is considered to be the most extreme and violent form of Islam). The Taliban, dominated by people with Pashtun identity.
3. Al Qaeda means “the base” or “the foundation”. Taliban means talib that means “student.”
Difference Between iPhone 3G and 3Gs
Difference Between UPS and Inverter
Taliban and al qaeda, the two terrorist organisations born out of Islamic roots, seem to be almost one and the same. Though the two talk of an Islamic world, there are much differences between the two.
While Mullah Mohammed Omar, who was an extremely enigmatic person, founded Taliban, the credit for al qaeda goes to Osama bin laden.
Al Qaeda consists of Sunni Muslims who practise Wahabism, which is considered to be the most extreme form of Islam. The al qaeda wants to establish Islamic rule and that all governments should be replaced by Islamic leaders.
The Taliban at first consisted of religious students who were very much conservative. They believed more in Sharia (Islamic law). The Taliban, dominated by people with Pashtun identity, controlled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. Though ousted from power in 2001, they have embarked again, spreading terrorism around the world.
Coming to the etymology, both taliban and al qaeda are Arabic. The meaning of al qaeda is “base”. Taliban means talib that means “student.”
The origin of al qaeda can be traced to the writings of Sayyid Qutb, an Islamic thinker. The basic ideology of al qaeda is to establish an Islamic state, with focus on Sharia. They want to get rid of socialism and nationalism, which they consider as non-Muslim concepts. The Talibans’ extremist ideology is only an innovative form of Islam in combination with Pashtun tribal codes with Deobandi interpretations.
While the Taliban are restricted to a particular region, the al qaeda has no boundaries.
Coming to the origin Taliban, two stories have been told. One story is that Mullah Omar and his students were agitated after the rape and murder of boys and girls of a family who were travelling to Kandahar. Another version is that Pakistan based truck shipping mafia had sought the support of Taliban to clear the road across Afghan to Central Asian Republics of bandits.
Al qaeda is considered to have formed in 1988 after a meeting between Osama bin Laden, leaders of Egyptian Islamic Jihad and Abdullah Azzam.
Summary:1. Mullah Mohammed Omar founded Taliban and the credit for al qaeda goes to Osama bin laden.
2. Al Qaeda consists of Sunni Muslims who practise Wahabism, which is considered to be the most extreme and violent form of Islam). The Taliban, dominated by people with Pashtun identity.
3. Al Qaeda means “the base” or “the foundation”. Taliban means talib that means “student.”
Difference Between PVT. LTD. Company and LTD. Company
PVT. LTD. Company vs LTD. Company
PVT. LTD. Company vs LTD. Company
In the corporate world, the abbreviations of “PVT. LTD. company” and “LTD. company” are very familiar. “PVT. LTD. company” stands for “private, limited company” while “LTD. company” as “public, limited company.” From its name, it implies that both type of companies have limited liabilities should there be an internal financial crisis like a bankruptcy. The type of limited company is the primary difference between the two. It also sets the tone for the additional differences.
The private, limited company is a company that is characterized by a smaller and restricted number of shareholders. The ownership of this type of company is in the hands of 2 shareholders (at the minimum) and up to 50 or so as the maximum number. The characters who hold the position of shareholders are often people within the same environment like family, friends, and close associates who know each other in many aspects. This characteristic makes the private limited company as some sort of corporate partnership firm.
Since the private, limited company consists of closely-related people, the shares within the company are also private and transferred within the shareholders. Shares cannot be transferred without another shareholder’s approval and cannot be held in a public medium like the stock exchange. Transactions within the private, limited company are not open to the public and no public offer is made. Though the sale is private and the transaction is not listed on the stock market, there is an existing record, and it is given to the government agency who handles these kinds of affairs. In transferring a share from one shareholder to another, there should be an invitation. The share would be sold privately.
The public, limited company (also known as LTD. company) as its name implies, is open compared to the private, limited company. The shareholders in this type of company vary since it is open for all interested parties Shareholders can start as low as seven members and can reach no limit or definite number.
The shareholders are limited in number, and they also serve on the Board of Directors.
The public character of this type of company makes the trading of shares easier. Shares can be freely traded on the stock exchange without discussion or permission from other or the majority shareholders. This is a testament to how the shares are open to everyone.
The public character of this type of company makes the trading of shares easier. Shares can be freely traded on the stock exchange without discussion or permission from other or the majority shareholders. This is a testament to how the shares are open to everyone.
In order to start the transfer, there is an open invitation via an advertisement to the public. Since there are many shareholders and interested buyers in a free market, trading occurs frequently, and many shares change hands as well.
Records in the public, limited company are open to scrutiny by its shareholders. The shareholders elect the Board of Directors, but the majority shareholder serves almost as somewhat the owner of the company.
Summary:
1.The difference between the two forms of limited company lies in their nature and character. The private, limited company, as the name implies, is shared by a limited number of shareholders; its transactions are negotiated away from the public, and it usually exists in small companies. On the other hand, the public, limited company is a company that is open to all interested shareholders with much more transparency in transactions, records, and other activities.
2.The shareholders of the private, limited company are usually restricted to family, friends, and other close associates while everyone is invited to be a shareholder of a public, limited company. The maximum number of shareholders is below 100 in a private company whereas there is an unlimited number of shareholders in a public, limited company.
3.There is also a difference in how the shares are transferred from one shareholder to another. Shares in the private company will undergo an approval from all shareholders and an invitation. The transaction is not open for public inspection. All of these are in contrast with the public, limited company where the shares are listed and traded freely in the stock exchange. This can be done with freedom and no advanced notice. The records are also available to view by the public (the shareholders, in this case).
4.Private, limited companies are usually small companies while their counterpart is often associated with big, corporate firms.
Difference Between iPhone 3G and 3Gs
iPhone 3G vs 3GS
The iPhone has been the most sought after mobile phone with each release. And now with the 3Gs in the market its time to compare the two. Apple says that the added ‘S’ stands for speed and the 3Gs does seem to sport a lot of speed improvements over the 3G. At first glance, there is almost nothing different about the two. Apple has decided to retain the winning iPhone look while managing to squeeze the improvements in.
The 3Gs comes equipped with a 600Mhz ARM processor which is better than the 412Mhz processor of the 3G. This added processing power allows users to run applications without any noticeable lags or freezes. The radio has also been upgraded in the 3Gs. Where the 3G can only achieve 3.6mbps, the 3Gs can reach the maximum of speed offered by the HSDPA technology which is 7.2mbps. These blazing internet speeds mean faster browsing and downloads for 3Gs users who live in areas with HSDPA.
The camera in the 3Gs is also an improvement of the old camera of the 3G. It no has a 3 megapixel sensor instead of a 2.0 megapixel. Apple also added video recording support in the 3Gs, a feature that 3G owners sorely missed since most mobile phones already support video recording at the time of the iPhone.
On the software side, Apple added extra features to keep the customers happy. The first is OpenGL ES 2.0 support which is an improvement over the 1.1 version supported by the 3G. This means that the 3Gs can draw images better which give app developers an additional tool to work with. Voice control has also been added to the 3Gs, a feature that lets you control your iPhone with the sound of your voice. There is also a compass application that is supported with an embedded magnetic compass. This allows you to use your iPhone just like a compass in case you get lost.
Summary:
1.They are more or less identical when it comes to the aesthetics
2.The 3Gs has a much faster processor than the 3G
3.The 3Gs can achieve 7.2mbps on HSDPA while the 3G can only achieve 3.6mbps
4.The 2.0 megapixel camera of the 3G has been replaced with a 3.0 megapixel camera that supports video recording in the 3Gs
5.The 3Gs can now support OpenGl ES 2.0 while the 3G can only support 1.1
6.The 3Gs has voice control and a magnetic compass which are not available in the 3G
1.They are more or less identical when it comes to the aesthetics
2.The 3Gs has a much faster processor than the 3G
3.The 3Gs can achieve 7.2mbps on HSDPA while the 3G can only achieve 3.6mbps
4.The 2.0 megapixel camera of the 3G has been replaced with a 3.0 megapixel camera that supports video recording in the 3Gs
5.The 3Gs can now support OpenGl ES 2.0 while the 3G can only support 1.1
6.The 3Gs has voice control and a magnetic compass which are not available in the 3G
Difference Between Blackberry Bold 9000 and Bold 9900 Touch Screen
Difference Between Animal and Plant cells
Blackberry Bold 9000 vs Bold 9900 Touch Screen
The Blackberry Bold 9900 Touch Screen is more than just an evolutionary step in the Bold series. It represents a huge leap, which is very atypical of RIM. The main difference between the Bold 9000 and Bold 9900 is what version of the Blackberry OS they are using. The older Bold 9000 uses the familiar version 6 while the Bold 9900 uses the revamped version 7. Most of the differences between the Bold 9000 and Bold 9900 that follows is a consequence of or a result of this fact.
To start with, the Bold 9900 has a touch sensitive display while the Bold 9000 doesn’t. There are older Blackberry phones that already featured touch sensitive displays, but the Bold 9900 is among the first to have this feature inherent with the operating system. This makes the overall experience more seamless than with other models.
One requirement of the new operating is better hardware because the 600Mhz processor and a mere 128MB of RAM, which is typical of most Blackberries and is installed in the Bold 9000 is not good enough to run the OS flawlessly. The Bold 9900 is equipped with a 1.2Ghz processor and 768MB of RAM, although may still be behind what other smartphones are packing, is a great leap from its predecessors.
The Bold 9900 also brings its camera into the bare minimum of what you’d expect in a smartphone; sporting a 5 megapixel sensor and is capable of geo-tagging, face detection, and much more. This is a great improvement to the plain Jane 2 megapixel camera on the Bold 9000. The Bold 9900 is also capable of recording 720p videos, not because of the camera but because of the more powerful processor. The Bold 9000 is capable of recording video but only at a much lower SD resolution.
The Bold 9900 is an excellent phone for RIM, not because it bests other smartphones but because it narrows that ever growing gap. It gives Blackberry users a little bit of what other smartphone users are getting while still maintaining the excellent email and messaging systems that is at the core of their service.
Summary:
1.The Bold 9900 Touch runs Blackberry OS 7 while the older Bold 9000 runs version 6
2.The Bold 9900 Touch has a touch sensitive display while the Bold 9000 doesn’t
3.The Bold 9900 Touch is powered by more powerful hardware than the Bold 9000
4.The Bold 9900 Touch has a higher resolution camera that is capable of HD video recording while the Bold 9000 doesn’t
2.The Bold 9900 Touch has a touch sensitive display while the Bold 9000 doesn’t
3.The Bold 9900 Touch is powered by more powerful hardware than the Bold 9000
4.The Bold 9900 Touch has a higher resolution camera that is capable of HD video recording while the Bold 9000 doesn’t
Difference Between Samsung Galaxy Ace and Apple iPhone 4
Samsung Galaxy Ace vs Apple iPhone 4
With more and more Android smartphones appearing in the market today, they are beginning to cover a broader price range. With the iPhone virtually stuck at a single price point, let’s see how the latest version of the iPhone compares to a relatively inexpensive Android phone like the Galaxy Ace. Of course, the main difference between the two is the operating system. Android is getting better all the time and offers a generally standard experience across different devices.
One area where the iPhone 4 clearly wins over the Galaxy Ace is in resolution. While the two phones have identically sized screens, the iPhone 4 has a 640×960 resolution. This is significantly more than the HVGA resolution that you get on the Galaxy Ace. Resolution is not really that significant with small devices and some people cannot really distinguish the difference. But, there are some people who really notice and appreciate the difference.
The cameras of the iPhone 4 and Galaxy Ace are seemingly the same as they both have 5 megapixel sensors. The difference between the two is quite clear when you delve into video recording. The iPhone 4 is able to record 720p, not the absolute highest but at par with what you’d expect a smartphone would have. In contrast, the Galaxy Ace can only record at QVGA resolution. This is very low even when compared to what most feature phones are capable of. The Galaxy Ace also lacks a front facing camera, which eliminates the possibility of video calling. The iPhone 4 does have a front facing camera but video calling is limited only to FaceTime when connected to a WiFi connection.
The Galaxy Ace is slightly thicker than the iPhone 4. Despite this, it still manages to shave some weight off; weighing almost 20% less than the iPhone 4. There’s not much difference in size though.
As a cheaper alternative to the iPhone 4, the Galaxy Ace is pretty much a good deal. Although it is quite lacking in some respects, it still gets the basic job done.
Summary:
1.The Galaxy Ace is an Android phone while the iPhone 4 runs on iOS
2.The iPhone 4 screen has a higher resolution than that on the Galaxy Ace
3.The iPhone 4 can record in HD while the Galaxy Ace cannot
4.The iPhone 4 has a front facing camera while the Galaxy does not
5.The Galaxy Ace is lighter than the iPhone 4
2.The iPhone 4 screen has a higher resolution than that on the Galaxy Ace
3.The iPhone 4 can record in HD while the Galaxy Ace cannot
4.The iPhone 4 has a front facing camera while the Galaxy does not
5.The Galaxy Ace is lighter than the iPhone 4
Difference Between Animal and Plant cells
Both plant and animal cells are eukaryotic cells, i.e., they have complex structures but the structures of both types of cells have major differences.
Animal cells do not have rigid cell walls like plant cells. This allows animal cells to form and adopt various shapes. A type of animal cell called the phagocytic cell can even absorb other structures. This ability is not inherent in plant cells.
Further, unlike animal cells, plant cells have chloroplasts for the utilization of sunlight and this is what also gives plant cells their green color. It is with the help of chloroplasts that contain chlorophyll, the plant cells perform the function of photosynthesis which is a process absent in animal cells.
Plant cells also contain a larger central vacuole (enclosed by a membrane) as compared to animal cells. Also, while animal cells depend on an analogous system of gap-junctions that allows communication between cells, the plant cells use linking pores in their cell wall to connect to each other and pass information.
Many types of plant cells, particularly in species like conifers and flowering plants, there is an absence of flagellae and centrioles that are found in animal cells.
Plant cells are also classified into three types. The parenchyma cells help in storage, photosynthesis-support and other functions and collenchyma cells are only present during the time of maturity and have only a primary wall. The sclerenchyma cells help in mechanical support. When it comes to animal cells, there are 210 distinct types of these in the human body.
There is another major difference between plant and animal cells. While the former turn carbon dioxide into sugar, it is the animal cells that break the sugar back down to carbon dioxide to make energy. This also reflects the cyclic functions of Nature and the interdependence of organisms through which Life on earth flourishes.
Difference Between Laptop and Notebook computer
Although laptops and notebooks have very similar traits such as they are both portable and you can take them anywhere, there are some differences between both of them.
Let us start with notebook computers; notebook computers are designed to allow you to do computer work while on the go and still offer all the power mobile users require for entertainment as well as work. This type of computer usually is not cheap and your top of the line notebooks can be very expensive.
Notebook computers are ultra light, which makes it easier for you to take it anywhere you want. The lesser the weight the better for you! It has 4 hours plus battery life, and it has a low profile, which means it’s thin. In addition, it doesn’t have an internal floppy disk, nor do you have the ability to utilize CDs or DVD’s. It has a minimal graphics subsystem. In addition to this, it has an integrated modem. If you require the services of the internet, that’s not a problem as it has a network connection. It’s screen is about 12″-14″ long and it has a keyboard that is just big enough to be functional.
Now as for a laptop, the name says it all. It is a portable unit meant for you to be able to work with while resting on your lap. In comparison to the notebook, it looks quite large and has lots of power with several features. The standard laptop should have most if not all the following features .
-Laptops usually are a little bigger than notebook computers and a little heavier than they are.
-They have an Nvidia GeForce or ATI Radeon graphics subsystem, Internal DVD-RW drive, an integrated modem, network and WI-FI capabilities
-The speakers are a integrated high quality system.
- It also has at least 2 hour plus battery life,
-The keyboard is large enough to be used conveniently.
-Laptops screens are at least 14″-17″ long.
-Also laptops are very upgradeable.
-Laptops usually are a little bigger than notebook computers and a little heavier than they are.
-They have an Nvidia GeForce or ATI Radeon graphics subsystem, Internal DVD-RW drive, an integrated modem, network and WI-FI capabilities
-The speakers are a integrated high quality system.
- It also has at least 2 hour plus battery life,
-The keyboard is large enough to be used conveniently.
-Laptops screens are at least 14″-17″ long.
-Also laptops are very upgradeable.
As you can see from the above information, there are many similarities as well as differences that exist between a notebook and laptop.
The design of the laptop gives you all the capabilities of a desktop computer yet remains mobile.
Difference Between UPS and Inverter
UPS vs Inverter
With our ever increasing reliance on electricity, it is quite annoying when outages in our power supply occur. To prevent getting interrupted in whatever we are doing, we have devices like inverters and the UPS. The main difference between the two is what their functions are. UPS stands for Uninterruptible Power Supply and its main function is as a flywheel storage system that is able to provide power to a device when the power from the main lines goes out. In contrast, an inverter’s function is basically to convert DC power to AC. You get DC from power sources like batteries while AC is what we get from our wall sockets. The two are not compatible so we need to convert one to the other if supply is different from what the device needs.
A UPS is a complete system that is composed of many parts. The typical UPS devices that we can buy from stores have multiple systems that include batteries, a charge controller, circuitry for switching between the mains and back-up battery, and an inverter. An inverter is needed because the battery can only store DC power and you need to convert that back to AC in order to match what was being provided by the main power line. Still, there are UPS devices that provide power to a device that uses DC power; these UPS devices do not use an inverter.
Aside from supplying power to keep devices running, a UPS also does a lot more. One of its functions is to provide surge protection, thereby protecting connected devices from getting damaged. Other UPS devices are also capable of conditioning the power from the lines to provide clean and stable power throughout.
Inverters are commonly seen in alternative power installations like solar. Solar panels provide DC power, which is then used to charge a battery bank. The inverter then converts that stored power so that it can be used by ordinary home appliances. Inverters are also used to provide limited power from the cigarette lighter socket of cars. This can be used to charge a laptop, tablet, and other devices.
Whether you will need a UPS or an inverter is down to what you really need. If you just want temporary power to tide you over short outages, a UPS of sufficient size would serve you well. If you are into alternative power or you want extended power, an inverter may be fit for you.
Summary:
1.A UPS provides power to a device even when power from the lines goes out while an inverter converts DC to AC voltage
2.A UPS may or may not have an inverter
3.A UPS does a lot more than an inverter
2.A UPS may or may not have an inverter
3.A UPS does a lot more than an inverter
Difference Between XML and XLS
XML vs XLS
File formats are always evolving, mostly to add new features but sometimes to fix shortcomings or to improve compatibility. XLS is one of the more popular, which is used in Microsoft’s spreadsheet application Excel. Changes occurring in Microsoft Office formats have led people to ask what XML is and how it pertains to XLS and Excel in general. The main difference between XML and XLS is what they actually are. While XLS is a file format, as already mentioned, XML is actually a markup language that is prominently used in web pages.
There are several more distinct differences between XML and XLS. First off, XLS is a proprietary format, which means that Microsoft holds the intellectual rights to it. The proprietary nature of XLS has made it difficult for other programmers to code their applications to read and write XLS files that are compatible with Excel. On the other hand, XML is an open format and the specifics of how things are to be done are documented. This removes the guesswork involved in figuring out how the file is structured and how each element is stored in the file. To complement this point, XML is also text based and can be read on any text editor. It might be a bit more difficult to read due to the tags, you can still find the actual content. With XLS, the file is stored in a binary format. Only Excel can reproduce the contents of the file with absolute accuracy as other applications may not be able to figure out the contents and how they are formatted.
Due to the several advantages that XML has over XLS that Microsoft was using at that time, a new format was introduced. This format carried the extension XLSX and is based on XML. It inherits many of XMLs strengths making it an excellent alternative. XLSX is just one of the new formats as other MS Office applications have also adopted new document formats based on XML. Only the 2007 version or later of MS Office have the ability to work with these files. Older versions need a compatibility patch to read them.
Summary:
1.XML is a mark-up language while XLS is a file format for Microsoft Excel
2.XML is an open format while XLS is a proprietary format
3.XML is user-readable while XLS is not
4.XLS is being replaced with a newer format based on XML
2.XML is an open format while XLS is a proprietary format
3.XML is user-readable while XLS is not
4.XLS is being replaced with a newer format based on XML
Difference Between Diet Coke and Coke Zero
Both ‘Diet Cokes’ and ‘Coke Zero’ are low calorie soft drinks compared to regular coke. Both have similar ingredients which are carbonated purified water, flavour, artificial sweeteners aspartame, acesulphame potassium, preservative and caffeine.
Diet Coke came on market in 1982; preferred by many in America and became the number one sugar-free drink. Diet Coke is also known as ‘Coca-Cola light’ in some countries and it is the No. 3 soft drink in the world. It is preferred by people who want no calories, but plenty of taste. Diet coke comes in many different flavours such as Black Cherry Cola Vanilla, Cola, Cola Green Tea, Cola Lemon, Cola Lemon Lime, Cola Lime, Cola Orange and Cola Raspberry.
But Coke Zero only offers’ Coca-Cola’ taste with zero calories. It is preferred mostly by young adults and it is sweetened with a blend of aspartame and acesulfame potassium (Ace K).
So overall the only key difference between the two drinks is in the proportions of the ingredients, which actually give different flavour profile.
Coke Zero has 0.5 kilocalories per 100ml while Diet Coke contains 1 calorie. It’s been believed that men are more reluctant to buy diet coke because the word ‘diet’ associated with women. Therefore, to market the product ‘Coke Zero’ been produced to associate masculinity.
Difference Between Pizza Sauce and Tomato Sauce
Pizza Sauce vs Tomato Sauce
Tomato sauce is a type of sauce which is made from tomatoes. Tomatoes are ideal for sauces because they have a liquid content, and they do not need any thickening agents to make them into thick sauces. Aside from this, the flesh of the tomatoes is very soft and they cook easily.
Tomato sauce is not considered a condiment. Rather, it is made for the purpose of mixing it with a dish that it becomes a part of. While it is very commonly used for vegetables and meat, it is also used as a sauce for pasta dishes and pizza.
It is prepared by first removing the seeds and skins and chopping the tomatoes. Afterwards the tomatoes are cooked in olive oil and seasoned with salt. To keep the sauce from becoming too dry, water, stock, or wine is added.
It is prepared by first removing the seeds and skins and chopping the tomatoes. Afterwards the tomatoes are cooked in olive oil and seasoned with salt. To keep the sauce from becoming too dry, water, stock, or wine is added.
To add more flavor, some spices such as garlic and onion are sautéed in olive oil before adding them to the tomatoes. Depending on the cook’s preference, ground meat and other spices may also be added including pepper to make it spicier.
The use of tomato sauce in Italian dishes came from its introduction by the Spaniards who brought the recipe from the New World. Its use in pasta was first mentioned in the late 1700s, and since then it has become very popular as part of pasta dishes and pizza.
Tomato sauce has many varieties, and they come seasoned with different herbs and spices. While it is very popular as an ingredient in pasta dishes, it is also an ingredient that pizza cannot do without. This sauce is known as pizza sauce.
Pizza sauce is a sauce which is put on pizza. It is usually made from a tomato base with several spices added. Sometimes it can be plain tomato sauce, but more often than not it is made with other seasonings and spices such as basil, oregano, pepper, garlic, and onion.
The use of tomato sauce in Italian dishes came from its introduction by the Spaniards who brought the recipe from the New World. Its use in pasta was first mentioned in the late 1700s, and since then it has become very popular as part of pasta dishes and pizza.
Tomato sauce has many varieties, and they come seasoned with different herbs and spices. While it is very popular as an ingredient in pasta dishes, it is also an ingredient that pizza cannot do without. This sauce is known as pizza sauce.
Pizza sauce is a sauce which is put on pizza. It is usually made from a tomato base with several spices added. Sometimes it can be plain tomato sauce, but more often than not it is made with other seasonings and spices such as basil, oregano, pepper, garlic, and onion.
Some even grill the tomatoes and crush them on the pizza while others use white sauce instead of tomato sauce. This is for white pizza which substitutes tomatoes with dairy products such as cream or pesto. This type of pizza will have cheese, olive oil, and spices as ingredients.
Summary:
1.Tomato sauce is a kind of sauce which is made of tomatoes together with herbs and spices while a pizza sauce is a sauce which one puts on pizza.
2.Tomato sauce has a tomato base while pizza sauce may or may not be tomato based but have cream or pesto instead of tomatoes.
3.Tomato sauce can be added to any type of dish; meat, poultry, and vegetables as well as for pasta dishes and pizza while pizza sauce is only used for pizza.
4.Tomato sauce almost always has a red color because of the tomatoes while a pizza sauce may be red in color when it is made of tomatoes or white when it is made with dairy products or cream.
2.Tomato sauce has a tomato base while pizza sauce may or may not be tomato based but have cream or pesto instead of tomatoes.
3.Tomato sauce can be added to any type of dish; meat, poultry, and vegetables as well as for pasta dishes and pizza while pizza sauce is only used for pizza.
4.Tomato sauce almost always has a red color because of the tomatoes while a pizza sauce may be red in color when it is made of tomatoes or white when it is made with dairy products or cream.
Difference Between Windows 7 Home Basic and Home Premium
Windows 7 Home Basic vs Home Premium
The most recent operating system from Microsoft, Windows 7, comes in a wide variety to suit the needs and budgets of the consumers. Even the Home edition of Windows 7 comes in basic and premium. Home Basic is understandably cheaper, and limited in capabilities when compared to Home Premium, but that is not the only difference. The Home Basic is not being sold worldwide like the Home Premium. It is only available in emerging markets, where budgets might be a little bit tight, and the lower price point could be the clincher. Home Basic is not available in most developed nations, like the US, UK, Canada, United Arab Emirates, Germany, and Italy, among some other countries. Restrictions have been put in place so that you cannot activate your copy of Windows 7 Home Basic if you are located in the countries where it is not being sold.
There are a number of limitations that apply to Home Basic. It’s support for Aero, the glasslike user interface that was introduced with Windows Vista, is only partial, while Home Premium users can take advantage of full Aero support. Limited Aero support is only a problem for computers lacking in hardware, as it is still possible to scale back with Windows 7 Home Premium, but with Windows 7 Home Basic, you are limited regardless of how capable your computer is.
Aside from visual limitations, there are also limitations in terms of it’s functionality. The Home Basic does not come pre-installed with the Windows Media Center. This software centralizes the media needs of the user, and adds TV functionalities. It lets you watch TV online, and even acts as your DVR by recording the TV shows that you like via a hardware TV tuner. You can also use the media center to watch movies or videos, and to browse through your photo albums. All of this is still possible with Home Basic, but you would need to access individual applications, like the media player and photo viewer.
Summary:
1. Home Basic is cheaper than Home Premium.
2. Home Premium is being sold worldwide, while Home Basic is sold only in certain areas.
3. Home Premium has full Aero support, while Home basic only has partial support.
4. Home Premium is able to create and join a home network, while Home Basic is only capable of joining.
5. Home Premium is already equipped with the Windows Media Center, while the Home Basic is not.
Difference Between Android 2.2 Froyo and Android
Android 2.2 Froyo vs Android 2.2.1
Any software needs to be maintained by its creators in order for it to keep up with the needs of the users. Android, the smartphone operating of Google, is no exception to this and its update cycle and has been pretty quick. There have been major updates and minor ones with Android 2.2 Froyo and Android 2.2.1 being respective examples. The main difference between Android 2.2 and Android 2.2.1, as you may have already deduced, is that the former is a major update while the latter is just a minor one.
Android 2.2, codenamed Froyo for Frozen Yogurt, is a major revision that introduced a number of new features. It can be downloaded from the respective phone makers and installed on the phone with the help of a computer. You can also visit their respective shops and have them do it for you. With major updates, it is almost guaranteed that users will find some bugs that were previously unknown. The creators then create patches to solve these problems as they appear; For Froyo, this is Android 2.2.1. As Froyo is just a very small patch, it is released OTA or Over The Air. You just wait for your service provider to send you a message asking prompting you that it will install the patch, which is done right after you confirm it.
Google did not release a changelog on what was actually done with the Android 2.2.1 patch so there is no definitive list of the changes. But, there is some consensus on what they noticed after the patch. The first is the better handling of the connection to Microsoft Exchange, which users reported to cause battery drain with Froyo. It is also believed that Android 2.2.1 fixes some security holes found on the initial release of Froyo.
Aside from fixes, Android 2.2.1 is believed to introduce performance tweaks that alleviate bottlenecks and allow the device to run faster. This is in response to some Galaxy S users who’ve experienced some lagging issues with their handsets after updating to Froyo. But, the tweaks should apply to everyone, thereby improving the overall experience.
Summary:
1.Froyo is a major version of Android while 2.2.1 is just a minor patch
2.Android 2.2.1 is released over the air while Froyo is not
3.Android 2.2.1 addresses several issues found on Froyo
4.Android 2.2.1 introduces a number of performance tweaks to Froyo
2.Android 2.2.1 is released over the air while Froyo is not
3.Android 2.2.1 addresses several issues found on Froyo
4.Android 2.2.1 introduces a number of performance tweaks to Froyo
Difference Between Efficiency and Effectiveness
Efficiency and effectiveness are both commonly used management terms. Yet, while they sound similar and start with the same letters, they both mean different things.
Efficiency refers to doing things in a right manner. Scientifically, it is defined as the output to input ratio and focuses on getting the maximum output with minimum resources. Effectiveness, on the other hand, refers to doing the right things. It constantly measures if the actual output meets the desired output.
Since efficiency is all about focusing on the process, importance is given to the ‘means’ of doing things whereas effectiveness focuses on achieving the ‘end’ goal.
Since efficiency is all about focusing on the process, importance is given to the ‘means’ of doing things whereas effectiveness focuses on achieving the ‘end’ goal.
Efficiency is concerned with the present state or the ‘status quo’. Thinking about the future and adding or eliminating any resources might disturb the current state of efficiency. Effectiveness, on the other hand, believes in meeting the end goal and therefore takes into consideration any variables that may change in the future.
In order to be efficient time and again, discipline and rigor is required. This can build inflexibility into the system. Effectiveness, on the other hand, keeps the long term strategy in mind and is thus more adaptable to the changing environment.
Since efficiency is about doing things right, it demands documentation and repetition of the same steps. Doing the same thing again and again in the same manner will certainly discourage innovation. On the other hand, effectiveness encourages innovation as it demands people to think, the different ways they can meet the desired goal.
Efficiency will look at avoiding mistakes or errors whereas effectiveness is about gaining success.
In the earlier days of mass production, efficiency was the most important performance indicator for any organization. However, with consumers facing an increasing number of choices, effectiveness of an organization is always questioned. In order to be a successful organization, there needs to be a balance between effectiveness and efficiency. Only being efficient and not meeting the requirements of the stakeholders of the organization is of little use to anybody. And effectiveness may result in success but at what cost?
Summary:
1.Efficiency means doing the things right whereas Effectiveness is about doing the right things.
2.Efficiency focuses on the process or ‘means’ whereas Effectiveness focuses on the end.
3.Efficiency is restricted to the present state whereas effectiveness involves thinking long term.
4.Organizations have to be both effective and efficient in order to be successful.
1.Efficiency means doing the things right whereas Effectiveness is about doing the right things.
2.Efficiency focuses on the process or ‘means’ whereas Effectiveness focuses on the end.
3.Efficiency is restricted to the present state whereas effectiveness involves thinking long term.
4.Organizations have to be both effective and efficient in order to be successful.
Difference Between Social Networking and Professional Networking
Social Networking vs Professional Networking
Computer use has become very prevalent during the last few years. While 20 years ago only a few people knew how to use a computer, today even little children have access and are already very knowledgeable about how to use computers.
Together with this development, many networking sites have popped up offering users a chance at interacting with other people from different places either for friendship, business, or for sharing common interests.
This is called social networking. The process of utilizing websites and computer networks to connect with family and friends, share opinions and information with other people, meet new friends and interact with each other, sometimes even finding a mate.
This is called social networking. The process of utilizing websites and computer networks to connect with family and friends, share opinions and information with other people, meet new friends and interact with each other, sometimes even finding a mate.
Social networking allows individuals a chance to find friendship and build relationships. It has been a very important tool for families who live far from each other to connect and keep in touch with each other. Through social networking, people are able to find long-lost friends and family as well as find new friends and meet people who share the same interests. It has also been a tool for people to earn money especially if one uses a professional networking site.
While most social networking sites such as Facebook and Yahoo Messenger are used for personal interactions, professional networking sites such as LinkedIn and WiseStep.com are used for building business and professional relationships and interactions.
Professional networking sites allow users to look for jobs using connections to find one that will suit one’s qualifications. Other users and possible employers can view one’s profile and share recommendations. They also allow professionals from different fields of interest to share opinions and knowledge while allowing users to ask questions which can be answered by one’s connections and providing answers to questions which one is knowledgeable about.
Professional networking sites allow users to look for jobs using connections to find one that will suit one’s qualifications. Other users and possible employers can view one’s profile and share recommendations. They also allow professionals from different fields of interest to share opinions and knowledge while allowing users to ask questions which can be answered by one’s connections and providing answers to questions which one is knowledgeable about.
While social networking sites also provide a means by which people can promote products and services, they are usually used for finding new friends and building social relationships rather than for professionals to find jobs and for businesses to find new employees.
Professional networking sites, on the other hand, allow businesses to post information about their companies which every member can view and letting them find new employees. It is also a tool for professional job seekers to post their profiles and find a job.
Summary:
1.Social networking is the process of using websites to connect with other people especially friends and family and to share information and opinions while professional networking is the process of using websites to connect with businesses and other professionals to look for employment or to share one’s knowledge.
2.Although social networking sites are also used to promote products and services, they are mostly used for personal interactions while professional networking sites are used for professional and business interactions.
3.In a professional networking site, users can post their profile which can be viewed by possible employers which also post their company’s profile while in a social networking site users post pictures, send and receive instant messages, and post updates about their lives.
2.Although social networking sites are also used to promote products and services, they are mostly used for personal interactions while professional networking sites are used for professional and business interactions.
3.In a professional networking site, users can post their profile which can be viewed by possible employers which also post their company’s profile while in a social networking site users post pictures, send and receive instant messages, and post updates about their lives.
Difference Between Communism and Democracy
Communism vs Democracy
Communism and democracy are two different ideologies that have rendered great impact in the world. Communism can be termed as a socio economic structure that stands for the establishment of a classless, egalitarian and stateless society. Democracy is a political system of governance either carried out by the people directly or by elected representatives.Communism is a political ideology that is based on a common ownership, mainly concerned with equality and fairness. In communism, the power is vested in a group of people who decide the course of action. It is this group of people who decide on the activities of the public. These groups of people may interfere in the public life of others. On the other hand, democracy, which also stands for equality in the society, is governed by a group of elected people. Democracy is a rule by the people and the elected representatives are bound to fulfil the wishes of the society.
A big difference seen between democracy and communism is in the term of economic systems. In communism, the government has complete control over the production and distribution of goods and all the resources and it is shared in the society equally. But in democracy, this aspect is not there.
In communism, it is the community or the society that holds the major resources and production. This helps in preventing any single person or a group of people from raising to a higher position than others or becoming rich. But in democracy, free enterprising is allowed, which means that people or groups can have their own businesses. This can lead to rich and poor in society.
Coming to democracy, there are no specific principles that define it. But democracy is based on the principle of equality and freedom. It is also based on the principle that all citizens have equal rights. Another principle that defines democracy is that the citizens have certain liberties and freedoms, which are protected by the constitution.
In communism private ownership is not allowed whereas in democracy it is allowed.
Summary
1.Communism is a socio economic system that stands for the establishment of a classless, egalitarian and stateless society. Democracy is a political system of governance either carried out by the people directly or by elected representatives.
2.In communism, the power is vested in a group of people who decide the course of action. Democracy is a rule by the people and the elected representatives are bound to fulfil the wishes of the society.
3.In communism private ownership is not allowed whereas in democracy it is allowed.
Difference Between Urban and Rural India
1.Communism is a socio economic system that stands for the establishment of a classless, egalitarian and stateless society. Democracy is a political system of governance either carried out by the people directly or by elected representatives.
2.In communism, the power is vested in a group of people who decide the course of action. Democracy is a rule by the people and the elected representatives are bound to fulfil the wishes of the society.
3.In communism private ownership is not allowed whereas in democracy it is allowed.
Difference Between Urban and Rural India
Urban vs Rural India
About 80 per cent of the Indian population live in villages. When travelling through the length and breadth of this subcontinent, one can really visualise the difference between rural and urban India.
There is a big difference between urban and rural India. One of the major differences that can be seen between rural India and urban India, is their standards of living.
People living in urban India have better living conditions than those living in the rural parts of India. There is a wide economic gap between rural and urban India. Rural India is very poor when compared to Urban India.
Another difference that can be seen between urban and rural India, is their education. In rural India, the parents seldom educate their children, and instead, make their children work in the fields. Poverty, and lack of sufficient infrastructure, can be attributed to the lack of education in rural India.
When considering homes, about three-quarters of the households in urban India live in pucca homes. On the other hand, only a quarter of the people in rural India live in pucca homes. While groundwater is the main source of drinking water in rural India, the urban people rely more on tap-water.
Urban India is almost electrified when compared to rural India. One can even come across villages where electric power is not yet available.
When comparng the sanitary facilities, it is limited in rural india. About 90 per cent of the households in rural India do not have latrines, but this is not the case in urban India.
Most of the developments have not yet reached the rural parts of India. With regards to health care as well, rural India lacks good hospitals when compared to urban India. Some of the rural areas even lack a dispensery.
Summary:
1. People living in urban India have better living conditions than those living in the rural parts of India.
2. Rural India is very poor when compared to urban India.
3. In rural India, the parents seldom educate their children, and instead, make their children work in the fields.
4. About three-quarters of the households in urban India live in pucca homes. On the other hand, only a quarter of the people in rural India live in pucca homes.
5. Most of the developments have not yet reached the rural parts of India.
6. With regards to health care, rural India lacks good hospitals when compared to urban India.
Difference Between Amazon Cloud Drive and External Hard Drive
Difference Between SSD and Hard Drive
Difference Between SATA and SATA II
Difference Between SATA and IDE Harddisk
Data storage has gone a long way since the days of tape drives, and there are now many ways to save your data. For most people who carry a lot of data with them, an external hard drive is a portable alternative that offers a very large capacity. But companies are now introducing services that aim to replace the external hard drive; like Amazon’s Cloud Drive. The main difference between an external hard drive and an Amazon Cloud Drive is that the Cloud Drive is a web-based solution unlike an external hard drive which is a physical device.
Since the Amazon Cloud Drive is a web-based service, you need to have access to the Internet in order to retrieve or store files. For most people, this is not a big problem since fast Internet connections are readily available. But for those who do not have access to a fast connection, an external hard drive is the only choice.
Getting an external hard drive typically means a single payment of $100 more or less for the actual drive. Amazon uses a rental model for the Cloud Drive. You get 5GB for free, and you pay $1 for every GB in excess of that every year. Given that drives do fail over time, the Amazon Cloud Drive is still more expensive than just buying a large capacity external hard drive.
But with the added cost, you also get some benefits. The biggest one is the assurance that your data will always be there. Because the data resides on Amazon’s servers, it is constantly backed up and protected against hardware failures. With external hard drives, you need to back up your data consistently. You never know when your external hard drive will get lost, get damaged, or just outright fail. Even if you back up your external hard drive weekly, you will still lose a few days’ worth of data in case the drive fails or is lost. This won’t happen with Amazon Cloud Drive. At worst, you will only lose a few hours’ worth of data if you’ve been uploading at the time of the error.
Summary:
1.Amazon Cloud Drive is a web-based storage service while an external hard drive is physical hardware.
2.Amazon Cloud Drive requires an Internet connection while an external hard drive doesn’t.
3.Amazon Cloud Drive is on a rental basis while an external hard drive needs to be purchased.
4.Amazon Cloud Drive is a more reliable data storage solution than an external hard drive.
2.Amazon Cloud Drive requires an Internet connection while an external hard drive doesn’t.
3.Amazon Cloud Drive is on a rental basis while an external hard drive needs to be purchased.
4.Amazon Cloud Drive is a more reliable data storage solution than an external hard drive.
Difference Between SSD and Hard Drive
Hard drives have been the storage medium of choice for a very long time due to its very high capacity and endurance. Data on a hard drive is stored on metal discs called platters which are spun around in order for the moving arm to read the magnetic data on the disc. The current emerging technology that has begun to compete with hard drives are Solid State Drives or SSDs. These store data in flash memory modules giving them a lot of advantages over hard drives.
The spinning platters and moving arms in a hard drive create a lot of unwanted problems that are not present in SSDs. The first of which is the power consumption. Converting electrical energy into mechanical energy always consumes a lot of power and creates heat as a byproduct. The moving parts also make hard drives susceptible to impact damage. SSDs do not suffer from these problems because it doesn’t have moving parts making it ideal for laptops and other mobile devices.
The speed at which data is read and written from the drive is a very significant factor for drives. In this aspect, the SSD also wins by a large margin since it acts just like the RAM in your computer. Data is readily written and read from an SSD unlike in a hard drive where the arm needs to be positioned to the right spot then wait for the platter to turn enough so that the arm can read the data.
The limiting factor in the general proliferation of SSDs at the moment is its price. SSDs are a lot more expensive compared to hard drives per gigabyte of storage, though the advantages are outweighing the cost in mobile devices like laptops. SSDs also suffer from a limited number of writes before a certain memory element fails. This is a trait shared by all flash based memory, although the specific number of writes before failure can vary from one device to another. Manufacturers combat this by a method called wear leveling, where they find the least often used portion of memory to write new data to. This allows the drive to survive a lot longer and the individual memory elements to fail at roughly the same time.
Summary:
1. SSDs have no mechanical parts like hard drives do.
2. SSDs can achieve much faster speeds compared to a hard drive.
3. SSDs can sustain a lot more force from impact compared to hard drives.
4. SSDs consume less power than hard drives.
5. SSDs have a very limited number of writes before it fails.
6. SSDs are more expensive than hard drives.
1. SSDs have no mechanical parts like hard drives do.
2. SSDs can achieve much faster speeds compared to a hard drive.
3. SSDs can sustain a lot more force from impact compared to hard drives.
4. SSDs consume less power than hard drives.
5. SSDs have a very limited number of writes before it fails.
6. SSDs are more expensive than hard drives.
Difference Between SATA and SATA II
SATA, which stands for Serial Advanced Technology Attachment, is the next step from PATA controllers used in the past. SATA controllers are easily identified by the narrower cables and connectors that are often colored red. If your computer was bough no more than 5-7 years ago, chances are you already have SATA controllers and drives. After a few years, SATA was improved and gave rise to SATA II. The main difference between the two is speed as SATA II can achieve speeds of double to that of SATA; SATA has a maximum uncoded transfer rate of 150MB/s while SATA II has a maximum uncoded transfer rate of 300MB/s
Although SATA II is newer, it still retains backwards compatibility with older SATA controllers and drives. When upgrading your motherboard, hard drives, optical drives, or any other devices that use SATA, you can safely opt for a SATA II capable device without having to worry if it would work with your set-up. Just keep in mind that you need to have SATA II a SATA II controller, drive, and even cable to get it to work at SATA II speeds. If any of the three doesn’t conform, the link would revert to SATA for compatibility.
When upgrading your system from PATA to SATA, or even to SATA II, do not expect a significant improvement in performance. The limiting factor in today’s systems is not the link from the drive to the processor but the drive itself. The mechanical components inside a drive are much slower compared to electrical signals. Because of this, most hard drives can’t exceed the transfer rates of SATA. So, if you have typical hard drives, then SATA II would probably do little to nothing for you. But when it comes to newer technologies like Solid State Drives (SSD), SATA II becomes very advantageous. SSD drives have flash memory and no mechanical components. They are very silent, power efficient, and very fast; some are even exceeding SATA II capacities. Its downside is cost and capacity as SSD drives often have much lower capacities at exorbitant prices.
Summary:
SATA II is faster than SATA
SATA II is backwards compatible with SATA
SATA II is optimal for flash drives while SATA is good enough for hard drives
SATA II is faster than SATA
SATA II is backwards compatible with SATA
SATA II is optimal for flash drives while SATA is good enough for hard drives
Difference Between SATA and IDE Harddisk
From the beginning of the computer era, the storage medium has been constantly evolving. From the floppy disks to the hard disk, their capacity has grown exponentially over the last few decades. But with the ever increasing capacities, new technologies should also be invented to cope up with the need to transfer large quantities of data as quickly as possible. This quest has lead to the transformation from Parallel ATA (also known as IDE) to Serial ATA.
At first sight, you would not notice the difference between a PATA and a SATA disk. The main visual difference appears when you connect them to the motherboard. A PATA disk uses an 80 pin ribbon that is about 3-4 inches wide while the SATA disk uses a 7 pin cable that is less than an inch wide. This allowed for a cleaner cable arrangement inside the case.
The differences between the two don’t end there. SATA disks offer a huge difference in performance when transferring data. Even thhe earliest version of SATA had a maximum transfer rate of 150MB/sec which is already ahead of the 133MB/sec transfer rate of the fastest PATA disk. Later versions of SATA disks can even achieve up to 300MB/sec. And soon, SATA3 disks would soon be available in the market; offering speeds of up to 600MB/sec. This alone has cemented the role of the SATA as the successor of PATA(IDE) disks in the desktop computer.
Aside from being substantially faster than the older PATA disks, SATA has features that are not found on the former. The Advanced Host Controller Interface utilized in SATA disks allows features like Native Command Queuing (NCQ) that improved the disks speed even more and the ability to connect a disk to an already running computer; this is called hotplug or hotswap technology and it isn’t found on the PATA disks. The hotplug feature of SATA disks also made it practical to allow external SATA disks to be connected just like Flash drives that utilize the USB port, turning the SATA disk into a high capacity portable drive. SATA disk can also be instantly configured into a RAID array if the motherboard supports it. Something that is not possible with PATA drives unless you have a specialized RAID card to handle it.
The shift from parallel to serial has proven to be a very advantageous one. Parallel disks are now beginning to slowly disappear in the market, making way for the faster performance and higher capacities of the SATA disk.
Difference Between UPS and Inverter
With our ever increasing reliance on electricity, it is quite annoying when outages in our power supply occur. To prevent getting interrupted in whatever we are doing, we have devices like inverters and the UPS. The main difference between the two is what their functions are. UPS stands for Uninterruptible Power Supply and its main function is as a flywheel storage system that is able to provide power to a device when the power from the main lines goes out. In contrast, an inverter’s function is basically to convert DC power to AC. You get DC from power sources like batteries while AC is what we get from our wall sockets. The two are not compatible so we need to convert one to the other if supply is different from what the device needs.
A UPS is a complete system that is composed of many parts. The typical UPS devices that we can buy from stores have multiple systems that include batteries, a charge controller, circuitry for switching between the mains and back-up battery, and an inverter. An inverter is needed because the battery can only store DC power and you need to convert that back to AC in order to match what was being provided by the main power line. Still, there are UPS devices that provide power to a device that uses DC power; these UPS devices do not use an inverter.
Aside from supplying power to keep devices running, a UPS also does a lot more. One of its functions is to provide surge protection, thereby protecting connected devices from getting damaged. Other UPS devices are also capable of conditioning the power from the lines to provide clean and stable power throughout.
Inverters are commonly seen in alternative power installations like solar. Solar panels provide DC power, which is then used to charge a battery bank. The inverter then converts that stored power so that it can be used by ordinary home appliances. Inverters are also used to provide limited power from the cigarette lighter socket of cars. This can be used to charge a laptop, tablet, and other devices.
Whether you will need a UPS or an inverter is down to what you really need. If you just want temporary power to tide you over short outages, a UPS of sufficient size would serve you well. If you are into alternative power or you want extended power, an inverter may be fit for you.
Summary:
1.A UPS provides power to a device even when power from the lines goes out while an inverter converts DC to AC voltage
2.A UPS may or may not have an inverter
3.A UPS does a lot more than an inverter
2.A UPS may or may not have an inverter
3.A UPS does a lot more than an inverter
